Mesorat%20hashas for Menachot 166:12
כל הארצות היו כשרות אלא מכאן היו מביאין:
AND WHICH IS THE CHOICEST? MICHMAS<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So according to many MSS.; in cur. edd. these names are corrupt. All three are Biblical place-names; for Michmas (var: Machnis, Machmis) v. Ezra II, 27; for Zanoha (var: Zatha, Zinuha) v. Jos. XV, 34, 56; for Hafaraim (var. lec: 'Afraim (cf. Ephrain in II Chron. XIII, 19) . 'Aforaim, Kufraim) v. Jos. XIX, 19.');"><sup>21</sup></span> AND ZANOHA<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So according to many MSS.; in cur. edd. these names are corrupt. All three are Biblical place-names; for Michmas (var: Machnis, Machmis) v. Ezra II, 27; for Zanoha (var: Zatha, Zinuha) v. Jos. XV, 34, 56; for Hafaraim (var. lec: 'Afraim (cf. Ephrain in II Chron. XIII, 19) . 'Aforaim, Kufraim) v. Jos. XIX, 19.');"><sup>21</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Menachot 166:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.